European Regulations

European Resolution Fund 2026: what changes in bank contributions

E
Equipo Editorial CambiosLegales
03 Jun 2026 7 min 61 views

Key data

RegulationDelegated Regulation (EU) 2026/440 of the Commission, of 24 February 2026
Modified regulationDelegated Regulation (EU) 2015/63
Publication3 June 2026
Entry into forceNot specified
Affected partiesCredit institutions, banks and investment firms subject to the Single Resolution Fund (SRF)
CategoryEuropean Regulation
Reference frameworkBank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD)
Impact analysis reserved for PRO
The detailed impact analysis of this regulation is available for users with a PRO plan or higher. Access the full content and receive personalized alerts.
From €9.99/month · Cancel anytime

The annual contributions that banks and investment firms pay to the Single Resolution Fund (SRF) will be calculated differently from the entry into force of the Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/440, published on 3 June 2026. The regulation modifies Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/63, which until now fully regulated this process, and removes one of the risk indicators used to adjust individual contributions from each entity.

For CFOs and compliance officers of financial entities, this means that the quota your entity pays each year to the SRF may change, up or down, depending on what weight that eliminated indicator had in your particular risk profile.

What does this regulation establish?

Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/63 establishes how ex ante contributions—that is, advance contributions, before any crisis occurs—to the Single Resolution Fund are calculated. This fund is the European mechanism that ensures that if a bank enters resolution, there are resources to manage it without resorting to public money.

The new Regulation (EU) 2026/440 introduces three blocks of changes to that base regulation:

Block of changeDescription
Method for calculating contributionsThe procedure for calculating contributions from certain credit institutions and investment firms is modified
Elimination of risk indicatorOne of the risk indicators that adjusted individual contributions to each entity's profile is eliminated
Procedural modificationsProcedural changes are introduced to simplify and expedite the determination of annual quotas

The elimination of the risk indicator is the change with the greatest practical impact. Until now, each entity's contribution was not a flat fee: it was adjusted based on several indicators that measured its level of risk. By removing one of those indicators, the relative weight of the others changes, which alters the final calculation result for many entities.

Economic and operational impact

The specific economic impact of this modification varies depending on the risk profile and size of each entity, as the regulation itself acknowledges. There is no uniform effect: some entities will see their annual contribution to the SRF reduced and others will see it increased, depending on how the eliminated indicator weighed in their individual calculation.

From an operational perspective, the changes affect two levels:

  • National resolution authorities: must adapt their calculation systems and internal procedures for determining quotas to the new methodology before the next settlement.
  • Financial entities: must review how the new method affects their estimated contribution and update their projections of regulatory costs for the current fiscal year.

The procedural modifications introduced aim to simplify and expedite the quota determination process, which in practice can reduce the administrative burden associated with justifying and documenting the calculation.

Who does it affect?

  • Credit institutions subject to the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD) and the Single Resolution Fund mechanism
  • Banks with activity in the European Union required to make ex ante contributions to the SRF
  • Investment firms included in the scope of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/63
  • National resolution authorities responsible for calculating and communicating individual contributions to each entity
  • CFOs, financial directors and regulatory compliance officers of financial entities that manage regulatory cost planning

Practical example

Imagine a medium-sized Spanish bank subject to the SRF whose annual contribution was calculated under Regulation (EU) 2015/63 with five risk indicators. One of those indicators—the one now being eliminated—penalized entities with a certain liability structure or level of exposure, increasing their risk-adjusted quota.

With the entry into force of Regulation (EU) 2026/440, that indicator disappears from the calculation. If that bank had a high-risk profile in that particular indicator, its adjusted contribution to the SRF could be reduced, since the factor that increased it is no longer applied. Conversely, an entity whose risk profile was favorable in that indicator—and which therefore benefited from a quota reduction thanks to it—could see its contribution increased as that downward adjustment disappears.

In both cases, the first step is for the financial team to request the national resolution authority to calculate the provisional amount under the new methodology to compare it with the amount from the previous fiscal year.

Do you need to track this and other regulations?

Consult the full details in CambiosLegales

What should companies do now?

  1. Identify if the entity is within the scope of application: confirm that the entity is subject to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/63 and, therefore, to the new Regulation (EU) 2026/440.
  2. Review the current contribution calculation: analyze which risk indicators were applied in the last calculation cycle and determine which one is being eliminated, to estimate the impact on the quota.
  3. Contact the national resolution authority: request information about the timeline for adapting to the new method and the estimated impact on the entity's contribution for the next fiscal year.
  4. Update regulatory cost projections: review the compliance cost budget to reflect the possible change in the SRF contribution under the new methodology.
  5. Adapt internal documentation procedures: take advantage of the procedural simplifications introduced by the regulation to reduce the administrative burden in the calculation justification process.
  6. Monitor the entry into force date: given that it is not specified in the publication, remain alert to communications from the Single Resolution Board (SRB) and the national resolution authority about the application timeline.

Frequently asked questions

What is the Single Resolution Fund and why do banks pay contributions?

The Single Resolution Fund (SRF) is the European mechanism that finances the orderly management of banks in crisis, avoiding the use of public money. Credit institutions and investment firms subject to the BRRD Directive make annual ex ante contributions, calculated according to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/63, now modified by Regulation (EU) 2026/440.

How does the calculation of contributions to the SRF change with the new regulation?

Regulation (EU) 2026/440 modifies the calculation method by eliminating one of the risk indicators that adjusted individual contributions. Additionally, it introduces procedural changes to simplify and expedite the determination of quotas. The specific impact varies depending on the risk profile and size of each entity.

When does Regulation (EU) 2026/440 enter into force?

The entry into force date is not specified in the publication of 3 June 2026. Entities must monitor communications from the Single Resolution Board (SRB) and their national resolution authority to learn the exact application timeline.

Which entities must adapt their calculations to the new methodology?

All credit institutions and investment firms subject to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/63 and the BRRD Directive are affected. National resolution authorities are responsible for adapting their calculation systems and communicating the new quotas to each entity.

Will my contribution to the SRF go up or down with this change?

It depends on the risk profile of each entity. If the eliminated indicator penalized your entity (increased your quota), the contribution could be reduced. If that indicator benefited you (reduced your quota), it could increase. The regulation expressly acknowledges that the economic impact varies depending on the risk profile and size of each entity.

Official source

Consult the complete regulation in the official source

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For specific decisions, consult a qualified professional. Source: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/./legal-content/AUTO/?uri=CELEX:32026R0440


Share:
E
Equipo Editorial CambiosLegales

El equipo editorial de CambiosLegales analiza diariamente los cambios normativos que afectan a empresas y autónomos en España, ofreciendo análisis pro...

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Leave a comment
Get free alerts